What Book About Spys Did Paige Read in the Americans
Restart This Test in a New Window!
Bookish Reading Test vi
Part ane
Why practice people collect things?
People from almost every culture love collecting things. They might collect stamps, books, cards, priceless paintings or worthless ticket stubs to old sports games. Their collection might hang on the walls of a mansion or be stored in a box under the bed. So what is information technology that drives people to collect? Psychologist Dr Maria Richter argues that urge to collect is a basic human characteristic. Co-ordinate to her, in the very first years of life nosotros class emotional connections with lifeless objects such as soft toys. And these positive relationships are the starting point for our fascination with collecting objects. In fact, the want to collect may get back farther yet. Scientists suggest that for some ancient humans living hundreds of thousands of years ago, collecting may take had a serious purpose. Merely past collecting sufficient nutrient supplies to last though freezing winters or dry summers could our ancestors stay live until the weather condition improved.
Information technology turns out that even collecting for pleasance has a very long history. In 1925, the archeologist Leonard Woolley was working at a site in the historic Babylonian city of Ur. Woolley had travelled to the region intending only to excavate the site of a palace. Instead, to his astonishment, he dug up artefacts, which appeared to belong to a two,500- twelvemonth-old museum. Amongst the objects was part of a statue and a piece of a local building. And accompanying some of the artefacts were descriptions similar modern-twenty-four hours labels. These texts appeared in three languages and were carved into pieces of clay. It seems likely that this early private collection of objects was created by Princess Ennigaldi, the daughter of Male monarch Nabonidus. Even so, very fiddling else is known about Princess Ennigaldi or what her motivations were for setting upwardly her collection.
This may have been one of the get-go big private collections, just it was not the last. Indeed, the fashion for establishing collections really got started in Europe around 2,000 years later with so-called 'Cabinets of Curiosities'. These were collections, normally belonging to wealthy families that were displayed in cabinets or small rooms. Cabinets of Curiosities typically included fine paintings and drawings, but equal importance was given to exhibits from the natural globe such equally animal specimens, shells and plants.
Some significant private collections of this sort date from the fifteenth century. One of the start belonged to the Medici family. The Medicis became a powerful political family in Italy and subsequently a royal business firm, but banking was originally the source of all their wealth. The family unit started by collecting coins and valuable gems, and so artworks and antiques from around Europe. In 1570 a secret 'studio' was built inside the Palazzo Medici to house their growing drove. This exhibition room had solid walls without windows to go along the valuable drove safe.
In the seventeenth century, some other fabulous drove was created by a Danish physician name Ole Worm. His collection room contained numerous skeletons and specimens, besides as ancient texts and a laboratory. Ane of Ole Worm's motivations was to point out when other researchers had made mistakes, such as the false claim that birds of paradise had no feet. He as well owned a dandy auk, species of bird that has now become extinct, and the illustration he produced of it has been of value to later scientists.
The passion for collecting was but as strong in the nineteenth century. Lady Charlotte Guest spoke at least six languages and became well-known for translating English books into Welsh. She as well travelled widely throughout Europe acquiring old and rare pottery, which she added to her collection at home in southern England. When Lady Charlotte died in 1895 this collection was given to the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. At around the aforementioned time in the north of England, a wealthy goldsmith named Joseph Mayer was building upward an enormous collection of artefacts, particularly those dug up from sites in his local area. His legacy, the Mayer Trust, continues to fund public lectures in accordance with his wishes.
In the twentieth century, the writer Beatrix Potter had a magnificent collection of books, insects, plants and other botanical specimens. Most of these were donated to London'south Natural History Museum, but Beatrix held on to her cabinets of fossils, which she was particularly proud of. In the United Stats, President Franklin D. Roosevelt began his stamp collection as a kid and continued to add together to it all his life. The stress associated with being president was easier to cope with, Roosevelt said, by taking time out to focus on his collection. Past the end of his life this had expanded to include model ships, coins and artworks.
Near of united states will never ain collections so large or valuable equally these. Even so, the examples given here suggest that collecting is a passion that has been shared by countless people over many centuries.
Office 2
Making Documentary Films
A For much of the twentieth century, documentary films were over shadowed past their more than successful Hollywood counterparts. For a number of reasons, documentaries were ofttimes ignored by critics and film studies courses at universities. Firstly, the very thought of documentary picture made some people suspicious. As the critic Dr Helmut Fischer put information technology, 'Documentary makers might have ambitions to tell the "truth" and show but "facts" but in that location is no such thing as a non-fiction movie. That'southward because, as presently every bit y'all record an incident on camera, you are altering its reality in a fundamental way'. Secondly, even supporters of documentaries could non agree on a precise definition, which did fiddling to ameliorate the reputation of the genre. Lastly, there were also concerns most the ideals of filming subjects without their consent, which is a necessity in many documentary films.
B None of this prevented documentaries from being produced, though exactly when the procedure started is open to question. Information technology is oft claimed that Nanook of the North was the first documentary. Made by the American filmmaker Robert J. Flaherty in 1922, the film depicts the hard, sometimes heroic lives of native American peoples in the Canadian Arctic. Nanook of the North is said to take gear up off a trend that continued though the 1920s with the films of Dziga Vertov in the Soviet Union and works by other filmmakers around the world. Even so, that 1922 starting indicate has been disputed by supporters of an earlier date. Amidst this group is film historian Anthony Berwick, who argues that the genre can exist traced back as early equally 1895, when similar films started to appear, including newsreels, scientific films and accounts of journeys of exploration.
C In the years following 1922, ane detail mode of documentary started to appear. These films adopted a serious tone while depicting the lives of actual people. Cameras were mounted on tripods and subjects rehearsed and repeated activities for the purposes of the film. British filmmaker John Grierson was an important member of this group. Grierson's career lasted nearly 40 years, starting time with Drifters (1929) and culminating with I Remember, I Remember (1968). However, by the 1960s Grierson'south style of film was being rejected by the Direct Cinema motion, which wanted to produce more than natural and authentic films: cameras were paw-held; no boosted lighting or sound was used; and the subjects did non rehearse. According to motion-picture show writer Paula Murphy, the principles and methods of Direct Movie house brought documentaries to the attention of universities and film historians as never before. Documentaries started to be recognized as a distinct genre worthy of serious scholarly analysis.
D Starting in the 1980s, the widespread availability of showtime video and then digital cameras transformed filmmaking. The flexibility and low toll of these devices meant that anyone could now be a filmmaker. Amateurs working from dwelling could compete with professionals in ways never possible before. The appearance of online film-sharing platforms in the early 2000s but increased the new possibilities for amateur documentaries were being made, perhaps the most popular documentary of 2006 was still the professionally fabricated An Inconvenient Truth. New cameras and digital platforms revolutionised the making of films. But as critic Maria Fiala has pointed out, ' The arguments sometimes put forward that these innovations immediately transformed what the public expected to see in a documentary isn't entirely authentic.'
E However, a new generation of documentary filmmakers then emerged, and with them came a new philosophy of the genre. These filmmakers moved away from highlighting political themes or urgent social problems. Instead the focus moved inwards, exploring personal lives, relationships and emotions. It could be argued that Catfish (2010) was a perfect example of this new trend. The film chronicles the everyday lives and interactions of the social media generation and was both a commercial and critical success. Filmmaker Josh Camberwell maintains that Catfish embodies a new realization that documentaries are inherently subjective and that this should be celebrated. Says Camberwell, 'It is a requirement for documentary makers to express a particular viewpoint and give personal responses to the fabric they are recording.'
F The popularity and variety of documentaries today is illustrated by the large number of motion picture festivals focusing on the genre around the world. The biggest of all must be Hot Docs Festival in Canada, which over the years has showcased hundreds of documentaries from more l different countries Even older is the Hamburg International Short Film Festival. Every bit its name suggests, Hamburg specializes in short films, but one category takes this to its limits – entries may not exceed 3 minutes in duration. The Short and Sweet Festival is a slightly smaller event held in Utah, USA. The small size of the festival means that for get-go timers this is the ideal venue to effort to get some recognition for their films. Then at that place is the Atlanta Shortsfest, which is a bang-up effect for a broad multifariousness of filmmakers. Atlanta welcomes all established types of documentaries and recognises the growing popularity of animations, with a category specifically for films of this blazon. These are just a few of the scores of motion picture festivals on offer, and there are more than existence established every year. All in all, it has never been easier for documentary makers to get their films in front of an audience .
Part 3
Jellyfish: A Remarkable Marine Life Form
When viewed in the wild, jellyfish are perchance the well-nigh graceful and vividly coloured of all sea creatures. But few people have seen a jellyfish living in its natural habitat. Instead, they might see a dead and shapeless specimen lying on the beach, or perhaps receive a painful sting while pond, so it is inevitable that jellyfish are often considered ugly and perchance dangerous. This misunderstanding can be partly traced back to the 20th century, when the utilise of massive nets and mechanical winches ofttimes damaged the delicate jellyfish that scientists managed to recover. As a result, disappointingly niggling enquiry was carried out into jellyfish, as marine biologists took the easy option and focused on physically stronger species such as fish, crabs and shrimp. Fortunately, however, new techniques are now beingness adult. For case, scientists take discovered that sound bounces harmlessly off jellyfish, and then in the Arctic and Norway researchers are using sonar to monitor jellyfish beneath the ocean'south surface. This, together with aeroplane surveys, satellite imagery and underwater cameras, has provided a wealth of new information in recent years.
Scientists know believe that in shallow h2o solitary there are at least 38 million tonnes of jellyfish and these creatures inhabit every blazon of marine habitat, including deep water. Furthermore, jellyfish were in one case regarded equally relatively solitary, but this is some other area where science has evolved. Dr Karen Hansen was the start to suggest that jellyfish are in fact the centre of unabridged ecosystems, every bit shrimp, lobster, and fish shelter and feed among their tentacles. This proposition has subsequently been conclusively proven past independent studies. DNA sequencing and isotope analysis have provided further insights, including the identification of numerous additional species of jellyfish unknown to science only a few years ago.
This brings united states of america to the issue of climate change. Research studies effectually the globe have recorded a massive growth in jellyfish populations in recent years and some scientists have linked this to climate change. However, while this may be credible, it cannot be established with certainty equally other factors might exist involved. Related to this was the longstanding bookish belief that jellyfish had no predators and therefore at that place was no natural process to limit their numbers. Still, observations made past Paul Dewar and his team showed that this was wrong. As a result, the scientific customs at present recognises that species including sharks, tuna, swordfish and some salmon all prey on jellyfish.
It is still widely assumed that jellyfish are among the simplest lifeforms, as they no brain or primal nervous system. While this is true, we now know they possess senses that allow them to see, feel and interact with their environment on subtle ways. What is more, analysis of so-called 'upside-down jellyfish' shows that they shut downwards their bodies and residuum in much the same manner that humans exercise at night, something once widely believed to be impossible for jellyfish. Furthermore, far from 'floating' in the h2o as they are all the same sometimes thought to exercise, assay has shown jellyfish to be the most economic swimmers in the creature kingdom. In brusque, scientific progress in recent years has shown that many of our established beliefs about jellyfish were inaccurate. Jellyfish, though, are not harmless. Their sting tin can cause a serious allergic reaction in some people and large outbreaks of them – known as 'blooms' – can damage tourist businesses, break fishing nets, overwhelm fish farms and block industrial cooling pipes. On the other mitt, jellyfish are a source of medical collagen used in surgery and wound dressings. In add-on, a particular poly peptide taken from jellyfish has been used in over 30,000 scientific studies of serious diseases such as Alzheimer's. Thus, our relationship with jellyfish is complex as at that place are a range of conflicting factors to consider.
Jellyfish take existed more or less unchanged for at least 500 million years. Scientists recognise that over the planet's history there accept been three major extinction events connected with changing environmental atmospheric condition. Together, these destroyed 99% of all life, only jellyfish lived through all three. Research in the Mediterranean Bounding main has now shown, remarkably, that in old age and on the point of death, certain jellyfish are able to revert to an earlier concrete state, leading to the assertion that they are immortal. While this may not technically be true, information technology is certainly an extraordinary discovery. What is more, the oceans today contain 30% more poisonous acid than they did 100 years agone, causing problems for numerous species, but not jellyfish, which may even thrive in more acidic waters. Jellyfish throughout their long history have shown themselves to be remarkably resilient.
Studies of jellyfish in form know as scyphozoa accept shown a life wheel of three singled-out phases. Showtime, thousands of babies known as planulae are released. Them, later a few days the planulae develop into polyps – stationary lifeforms that feed off floating particles. Finally, these are transformed into something that looks like a stack of pancakes, each of which is a tiny jellyfish. Information technology is now understood that all species of jellyfish get through similarly singled-out stages of life. This is further evidence of just how sophisticated and unusual these lifeforms are.
Answers
(Q.1 to Q.10)
1. True
two. True
3. Simulated
4. True
5. Not Given
half dozen. Simulated
7. banking
8. chemical composition
ix. windows
10. illustration
(Q.11 to Q.20)
11. lectures
12. fossils
thirteen. stress
fourteen. 4
15. vii
sixteen. i
17. eight
eighteen. v
19. iii
20. D
(Q.21 to Q.30)
21. C
22. A
23. East
24. three minutes / 3 minutes
25. kickoff timers / 1st timers
26. animations
27. No
28. Yep
29. Not Given
30. No
(Q.31 to Q.40)
31. Non Given
32. Yep
33. B
34. A
35. C
36. B
37. C
38. E
39. A
40. D
Source: https://www.ieltstester.com/academic-reading-test-6/
iii.seven 25 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
I am going to join duscussion
Very very poor, near of the answers exercise not lucifer to this. Totally time waste material ieltstester.com
Faria Waseem
8 months ago
question viii and 9 doesn't seems to be correct ,Instead of analogy it should be POTTERY, and despite of chemical limerick their should be Windows.
#ten. Lady Charlotte Guest created a collection Analogy…… IN THE PARAGRAPH THEY DIDNT MENTION ANYTHING Well-nigh ILLUSTRATIONS? TELL ME IN THAT PARAGRAPH WHERE THEY PLACE ILLUSTRATIONS. I ONLY READ AND SAW POTTERY.
The question in #viii doesn't seem to fit the correct answer.
At the Palazzio Medici in that location was a hidden 'studio' which had no: chemical composition
THAT DIDNT Make Whatever SENSE
# 9 respond also didnt make any FVCKING sense.
33/40, it was a dandy test, thnx